North America is atwitter! The new American President has variously commented on the possibility of Canada becoming the 51st state, or he has actually threatened to make Canada the 51st state through the use of economic pressure.
He is full of shit up to his eyeballs. Here is why...
By "51st state", what is clearly meant is that Canadians would become Americans in every sense of the word, especially when it comes to political rights. President Trump has never suggested something like territorial status for Canada, akin to the status of Puerto Rico.
The prospect of 41 Million Canadians voting in elections for the House of Representatives, the Senate and the Presidency will cause Republicans to reject any notions of Canadians becoming Americans. The political implications for Republicans are so dire, that Canadians will not become Americans even if they were asking for the honour (Note - spelled "honour", not "honor".)
For starters, 41 million Canadians becoming Americans would work out to about 55 seats in the House of Representatives. Looking at the results of the last five congressional elections, the largest majority that was obtained by either the Republicans or Democrats was a 47 seat majority for the Republicans in 2016. Right now, the Republicans have a razor-thin 3 seat majority.
If former Canadians could vote in US elections, recent polling shows that they would vote between 42% and 62% for the Democrats, and only 14% to 21% for the Republicans. There were a large number of undecideds in these polls. Apportioning these undecided preferences across the given results, we get about 72% support for the Democrats, and about 28% for the Republicans. If this were to hold, the Democrats would see another 38 - 40 seats in the House of Representatives each election, and the Republicans would receive about 15 - 17 seats.
Conclusion - With Canadians voting in American elections, it may be virtually impossible for the Republicans to ever win a majority in the House of Representatives, absent a generations-long demographic shift in voting patterns.
If Canada went into the United States as one state, it would get two senators. But it would also be larger than the other fifty states combined. This makes no sense. To maintain some semblance of geographic balance, and to respect the substantial cultural, economic and political differences between Canadian provinces, it would make more sense for the ten Canadian provinces to go in as separate states, with the territories accorded something like territorial or commonwealth status.
Doing this would net Canadians ten seats in the Senate. If present voting patterns held, Alberta and likely Saskatchewan would vote Republican; Quebec would vote for an independent senator who would easily identify with the Democrats - think in terms of a French Bernie Sanders - and the other six Canadian states would vote for the Democrats. The result would be 16 new Democratic senators to only four Republican senators.
Right now, the Republicans only have a three seat majority in the United States Senate.
Given how close the election results normally are in the Senate, bringing Canadians into the American political fold would mean that the Republicans may not win the Senate ever again.
Finally, 41 million Canadians would get about 75 Electoral College votes in every United States presidential election (N.B. number of Senate seats plus number of seats in the House of Representatives.) If Canadian voting intentions held, and assuming that only Alberta and Saskatchewan went Republican, bringing Canadians into the United States political system would net the Democratic candidate about 60 out of a possible 75 Electoral College votes in every presidential election.
In last year's presidential contest, Donald Trump won 312 Electoral College votes to Kamala Harris's 226. Adding likely Canadian voting results to this would have had Trump at 327, and Harris at 286, so the result would have been the same. Nonetheless, with former Canadians voting in American elections, Republican presidents would face a permanently hostile Congress.
Republicans can do math. They no doubt completely understand the implications of absorbing 41 million Canadians in to the United States political system, and that those implications would be dire for their collective political prospects. Because of this, it wouldn't happen even if Canadians were asking to join.
But that is not all....
Canadians have a different political culture and experience than that of Americans. They have a history of either voting for regional parties, or for voting for national parties with strong regional biases. This raises a delicious possibility...
What if Canadians, after having been forced to join the United States, refused to vote as either Republican or Democrats, and voted for a Canada Party instead?
A Canada Party would almost always hold the deciding vote on every single piece of legislation, and every single budget initiative in the House of Representatives and the Senate as neither the Republicans not the Democrats could normally obtain sufficient seats to constitute a majority and pass legislation without Canadian support.
In short, to get any work done in the form of new laws or budgets, the Republicans and/or the Democrats would have to buy Canada's vote.
Canadians are very familiar with the brokerage style of politics in the USA - "You scratch my back and I'll scratch yours." One can just imagine the number of bridges to nowhere and hockey museums that Canadians' ability to blackmail the American legislative and budgetary process could buy!
And there's more!
If Canadians were forced into the American political system with full political rights, presumably they would be able to run for the office of the President of the United States!
What would happen if a Canadian candidate for the presidency offered stronger labour protections (Note - spelled "labour" not "labor"); a "free" single-payor health care system; and the taxation of the wealthy in favour of income transfers to the poor and middle class to an American citizenry that has been duped into thinking that their subservience to the wealthy; diminishing economic well-being; and scant access to health care is "freedom"?
These people have been betrayed by political sell-outs across the American political spectrum - both Left and Right. Would something like this coming from a Canadian presidential candidate shake up the "swamp"?
Yup, and that's why the Democrats, who offered none of this in the last election cycle, would also not want Canadians in the American political system.
The Democrats are sell-outs?
Here is Bernie Sanders' response to President Trump's inaugural address. It covers everything Sanders thought Trump should have addressed in his speech if he actually cared about Americans. What he didn't say was that it was also everything that Harris wouldn't or couldn't promise either.
The Democrats know who gave her $1 Billion for her campaign, and what they are expected to not do for the American people in return.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vHH-KI2yk8s